Vacant
Property Registration
The Need for Statewide Guidelines
By Robert
Klein
Cities
across America are now using vacant property registration laws as a tool to
catalogue properties in their communities and locate the responsible party for
a home. In 2008, I prompted the creation
of the vacant property registration committee for the Mortgage Bankers
Association where the concept for this type of ordinance was fully developed. I
led the committee in bringing together industry representatives to discuss the
impact of these rules on the property preservation world, and recommend more
workable alternatives for both cities and servicers. Over the last five years the property
preservation industry has watched as these laws have evolved for the better and
for the worse.
For the
better we have seen local governments taking steps to craft smarter laws and
work with servicers to more easily achieve compliance. For the worse we have seen cities use these
laws as a tool to pad struggling municipal budgets. From big cities to small towns we see fees
for each vacant property from $10 to $500, with penalties reaching up to $1,000
a day or more for failure to comply with ordinance requirements.
While there
is no doubt that this is troubling, it is not the biggest challenge we face
when it comes to registration guidelines.
For servicers the biggest obstacle in complying with these ordinances
from city to city is the lack of uniformity.
With an estimated 35,000 municipalities in America, today we are aware
of about 1,500 different municipal ordinances. Those numbers tell us
there is potential for thousands more. A
tool that would remedy this problem would be for each state to establish a
statewide vacant property registration law.
It would permit each state to consider their local needs when crafting
the legislation and give them a better tool to fight blight on a large
scale. This would also allow for
servicers to follow 50 different sets of guidelines rather than 1,500 and
ultimately support greater compliance.
Local
governments and municipalities have a lot on their plate as they struggle to
make ends meet and I believe the statewide law of this nature could alleviate
some of that stress. Not to say that our
states are not feeling the same pressure, but I know that this implementation
would make our efforts to fight blight more effective and help our struggling
communities.
I enjoyed your view point, and I agree with it. I have been working hard with my service are, and municipalities building awareness the last year while completing industry field work. I believe more who know, the more who will be educated on proactive measures to assist the process. I think the education will bring closure faster to many properties sitting idle. Thank you for sharing your insight.
ReplyDelete-J.Hummel
Mr. Hummel, thank you for your response and taking the time to read my blog. You are absolutely correct in your belief that educating the appropriate parties on this issue will raise greater awareness. Being proactive is the strongest defense against blight.
Delete