Code enforcement officials cover a lot of ground both in
both small towns and large cities.
Whether it is enforcing guidelines that support health and safety rules
or uphold housing standards, their primary function is to ensure compliance with
local policies to ultimately protect the communities they serve. In my world, I work closely with officials
who are tasked with dealing with housing issues, more specifically, homes that
are vacant or have been abandoned. Coming
from all parts of the Nation, they have various challenges when enforcing
housing codes but they all share one common goal and that is to protect the
interests of their community. Because of
that singular goal and dedication to their community, it is of the utmost
importance that we include this group of experts in their own right, in
industry conversations on how we can combat blight.
It goes without saying that for the better part of the last
decade, the crash of the housing market has made the demands of code
enforcement officials unrelenting. As
vacant and abandoned properties piled up in America’s cities and towns so did
the code violations. With limited
budgets and few tools to track down the party responsible for these violations,
enforcement officials found themselves at a loss. To remedy this they spoke up and made their
voices heard. They used their direct
connection with these communities to solve major enforcement problems. However I believe we still have a major challenge
with our ability to effectively communicate with this segment of the industry,
especially when discussing community blight.
One of the most important things we have learned through
this crisis is that when creating solutions our whole is more than the sum of
our parts. While our ability to
collaborate has come a long way, it is my opinion that if we did a better job
of bringing code enforcement officials into conversations with lenders,
servicers, and property preservation organizations, we could more easily create
effective solutions. Code enforcement officials offer an exclusive perspective
on blight that we are not able to take on in an empathetic kind of way. Their first-hand experience in communities
with unique challenges and problems is vital to policy making.
Having these individuals in the room will not only make us
smarter, it will make our solutions smarter.
Let’s remember that the next time we sit down to solve problems. Working independently maybe we can solve one
or two of our problems, working together we can solve industry problems.
We have received some very positive feedback on the call for greater communication in, “Problem Solving with Code Enforcement Officials”.
ReplyDelete“Great e-mail Robert! Thank you for all you have done to make our partnerships work!”
Frank Cassidy, CEP
City of Cape Coral
“Thank you so much! I love this article and hopefully it will get the attention of those who still choose to ignore us out there!!!”
Sherri Johnston
Environmental Code Manager
City of Mesquite, Texas
“Well said! Were it not for you - things would be very different!”
Pura S. Bascos
“Well said my friend.”
Doug Leeper
Consultant
Code Enforcement Solutions
“What you have said is so true. It’s better to have Code Enforcement as a friend than as an advisory. When I was running the VA Property Management Unit in Florida, I made it a point to visit our Code Enforcement Officers in the major cities like Miami, Jax, Orlando and Tampa. I knew some of the officials by their first names. When I met with them, I basically asked them what they needed from us and we negotiated on many of the requirements the cities had.. That was 10 years ago and believe it or not, I get a call every once in a while from one of them looking for help on a property issue. We have to be flexible and keep in mind that it’s their community they are trying to protect.”
John Acosta